Multiculturalism is an oxymoron.

Written by Andy

Diversity is division! Unity is strength. The term Multiculturalism is an oxymoron. A culture is something that grows over many centuries as a set of rigorously enforced local rules and customs to enable people in that region to interact in a harmonious manner for the purposes of sustaining life in that region. It is not possible to have different cultures in one region for very long as different attitudes, breeding technologies, and so forth will eliminate all but the cultures with aggressive practices. One culture will teach that its culture is superior and the others can be taken advantage of. Bingo! Mayhem. Moses stated to the Hebrews of the time (Until Jesus corrected the thinking) that “These lands that I give you, you shall kill the inhabitants therein. This includes the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites , … etc.” He gave the formula to do it – Usury – impoverish them with money lending. He stated: “You shall rule over many peoples, but no peoples shall rule over you.” Islam has various statements about ‘putting down’ other religions. Jesus came along and constantly rebuked people that did not fit his prescription of ‘common decency’. He did not advocate ‘be tolerant of the intolerant’. The man was extremely intolerant of intolerant people. And so we should not tolerate the intolerant.

Over many centuries we created a Europe that was for the most part what Jesus desired in the story of the Good Samaritan. This story is of a society that had ferocious splits and included people that robbed and left people for dead. We are again creating that dreadful split society. We cannot create a peaceful society by introducing people that are intolerant of the ‘Philosophy of Jesus’. Even the atheists do not follow the law of the jungle and kill and maim. They follow the prevailing philosophy and culture of the west which is essentially the ‘Philosophy of Jesus’ – irrespective of whether they say their bedtime prayers. The Muslims can have their ‘jihad’ – in their Muslim countries. The Jews can have their usury – in their country. (The one they stole. not the ones they have been thrown out of for practicing usury. The one where they follow Moses with: “These lands that I give you, you shall kill the inhabitants therein. This includes the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites , … etc.”)

Society is comprised of individuals operating together for what was common in human needs, both physical, emotional, and spiritual. We do not act as individuals for to do so is to go back to prehistory and create a ‘dog eat dog’ society where no one looks farther than ‘what is in it for them’. I society of selfish individuals. I will describe them as ‘heartless’. It is an interesting exercise to accommodating many views, without elevating one set of values and beliefs as the core value system as the social fabric. To papering over differences with ‘hate laws’ is but a temporary illusion. It is not working. Europe’s experiment with multiculturalism is well advanced and it is discovering its folly.

Culture is a concept that once had certain element of ‘quality’ to it. Some may consider its antithesis to be barbarism. Glavis on Urban Dictionary describes it as a person: “To have refinement in taste and manners. To be refined, well-educated or worldly. This may apply to manners, dress, language or lifestyle. Learned in the way of civilized society.” It derives from the Latin cultus. Its roots are similar to those of cultivate: to till and prepare for growth. Similar to education, culture could be considered to have levels from low to high and the high culture was considered different and better than low culture, which in turn was better than uncultured. And so culture represented excellence.
However, Multiculturalism is typically defined as: “the presence of, or support for the presence of, several distinct cultural or ethnic groups within a society.” This does not match the previous definition of culture and has more to do with race mixing and colour mixing in a society. The sales pitch for ‘Multiculturalism’ is not just accept the small mix of peoples as they existed, it used a sales pitch to push a forced brand of ‘multiculturalism’. Thus, if there weren’t enough alternative cultures to demonstrate multiculturalism, they were imported so that the dominant culture was no longer dominant or exclusive. Thus it was ‘forced’ multiculturalism. Collins describes: ” Multiculturalism is a situation in which all the different cultural or racial groups in a society have equal rights and opportunities, and none is ignored or regarded as unimportant.” The original culture comes in danger of being sidelined.

“What multiculturalism boils down to is that you can praise any culture in the world except Western culture – and you cannot blame any culture in the world except Western culture.” -Thomas Sowell

Now back to Urban Dictionary, and one contributor contributes:

Multiculturalism is a marxist ideology designed to ethnically cleanse European derived peoples by promoting the massive 3rd world invasion of Europe, United States, Canada, and Australia. Multiculturalism leads to racial tension and may erupt into a racial conflict once the racial spoils system breaks down. For example – multiculturalism is in full swing in California. Blacks and Hispanics are engaged in a violent racial struggle in Los Angeles

The violent racial struggle he refers to is between the black cats and Hispanic cats. He is not referring to white cats. And another Urban Dictionary contributor:

The “multiculturalism” forced upon White Nations is a con. It’s a Marxist ideology designed to fail and destroy. The con is that the definition of multiculturalism has been changed in our minds to mean multiple cultures living among each other in the same place. This is the antithesis of true multiculturalism. This fake multiculturalism actually destroys cultures.

Sensible person:

Multiculturalism just doesn’t make sense, the entire world is full of ethnic strife and violent cultural rivalries that can’t be contained by the largest oceans and most vast continents. Wouldn’t throwing all of these groups into one country just mimic the global situation on a domestic scale?


A leftist Marxist political code word for “wipe out Whitey”. Multiculturalism is the state religion of all countries that are predominately White. Liberals have no problem with countries like Japan or Nigeria being racially solid, but all White countries NEED diversity!

The above are written by everyday citizens, not the foreign influences and corporate entities that control our political parties. Nobody gets to vote on the introduction of ‘Multiculturalism’. You get it whether you vote for party puppet A or for party puppet B. It is pushed into the policy of all political parties. You get to vote on whether it happens this week or next week.

Jesus did not advocate mixing. He told us about the problems of multicultural societies in the parable of the ‘Good Samaritan’. It was a horribly split society where different groups failed to get on with each other and inflicted great harm on individuals of opposing groups. He advocated getting own with each other in a common culture. His culture – which we should know as the ‘Philosophy of Jesus’. We had created this culture of ‘common decency’ now split asunder by immigration.

The next definition demonstrates special interest groups special favour out of proportion to population:

That acknowledgement can take the forms of recognition of contributions to the cultural life of the political community as a whole, a demand for special protection under the law for certain cultural groups, or autonomous rights of governance for certain cultures. Multiculturalism is both a response to the fact of cultural pluralism in modern democracies and a way of compensating cultural groups for past exclusion, discrimination, and oppression.

And this is where we get on edgy ground. If a group can claim ‘victim status’, they win. The individual is reverse categorized based on race, religion, class, and sex, where different is put above normal. A more radical approach by some theorists is that some racial, religious, and sexual groups need more than simple recognition to maintain of a distinct identity. Rather than existing under a system of individual rights, some gain special group rights. But the very concept of rights is to be questioned. Living in a community involves responsibilities before rights. We cannot harmonize in a community if individuals do no more than demand rights including the right to refuse work and demand welfare. We now finish up with protected minority cultures that never existed in the previous harmonious dominant culture created over millennia. Thus, under this loony left paradigm, minority groups can be given preference rights over an indigenous dominant culture. The reality is demonstrated in the stupidity of the following conversation:

Then the war of words steps up a notch:

Which then takes the keyboard warriors to the statistical punching bag:

Which then leads to accusations that black people are incarcerated because they are black and not because the committed a crime or because blacks are under-privileged and need special consideration. Then the keyboeard warriors cite:

One must be careful as our justice system is not really a ‘justice system’. The results produced by the justice system cannot be considered a fair measure of the crimes involved. Some doubt the statistics. Here is an extract:

Even if the statistics are incorrect, the fact that people are comparing them is problematic in itself. Even the article that cited the above statitsics called the white people ‘white supremists’ – which is itself a racial slur. Anybody that stads up for the ‘western white Christian’ is a white supremist.

The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) is a large survey of about 90,000 households with 160,000 people. Their results can be somewhat different to crime report statistics and different again to statistics on convictions and imprisonment. However, for some items the sample size is small giving unreliable results.

The differences, real or perceived, are enough to create division and distrust. The fact that anyone looks for the differences, is an indication of distrust. The fact that someone might create distrust is evidence the distrust grows in multicultural situations.

Table 42 of the NCVR shows that for the crime of rape/sexual assault,

74.9% of white victims were attacked by white offenders
16.4% of white victims were attacked by black offenders
74.8% of black victims were attacked by black offenders
zero% of black victims were attacked by white offenders

Kingfrak comments in June 22, 2017:

Well, if you look at interracial violent crime in general, Blacks are the perpetrators 84.9 percent of the time, and when Whites commit violent crimes, they choose blacks as their victims about 3.6 percent of the time. So, why would the rape statics be so vastly different when removed from assault, murder, robbery, etc..?

But the divides increase when the people are suspicious of what Jewish immigrants may have been scheming:

A Marxist trying to spin statistics, because facts are racist. Especially “problematic” are IQ and crime statistics. Those numbers must be wiped out of existence if cultural Marxism is to bring down Western society, so a communist dystopia can take over. The thinly-veiled Marxist “Frankfurt School” brought this disease to the US during WW2, by German Jews. Hmmmm, “Kohen”; I wonder what that would be…

John Lathrop — July 2, 2017
Kohen is generally a Jewish name. Wil Clemens points out that: “Every time anything is posted negative about African American’s its a racist KKK site” and that the white people are ‘white supremists’. Yet Okaro interupts by stating: “The truth is racist. Whether the figure is exactly zero is irrelevant. There is a clear disparity in interracial rape.”

Someone states that he believes that David Duke is former kkk and someone else accuses him of being a racist as if these reasons should be sufficient to ignore what David Duke tells us. Heavilly edited and controlled Wikipedia claims:

David Ernest Duke (born July 1, 1950) is an American neo-Nazi, anti-semitic conspiracy theorist, far-right politician, convicted felon, and former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. Duke is a Holocaust denier, and espouses conspiracy theories about Jewish control of academia, the press, and the financial system.[3][4] Duke has been described by the Anti-Defamation League as “perhaps America’s most well-known racist and anti-Semite”.[5]

After some more taunts against this white man, it continues with:

Duke speaks against what he alleges as Jewish control of the Federal Reserve Bank, the U.S. federal government, and the media. Duke supports the preservation of what he considers to be Western culture and traditionalist Christian family values, as well as voluntary racial segregation, anti-communism, white separatism, and the abolition of the Internal Revenue Service. [8][9][10]

Apparently, there is no police investigation into his claims of Jewish control of the Fed. There is no police investigation into Jewish control of the government. I rather like the idea of preservation of the ‘Western culture’. I like the idea of conserving ‘traditionalist Christian family values’ – a value system common to many religions. His ‘voluntary racial segregation’ is occurring in the purchase habits for housing in metropolitan areas where Hispanic areas, black areas, and ‘white flight’ occurs to towns that are predominantly white. David Duke was kicked off Twitter in 2017 and he claims that it was because “I expose the fact that Israel is an ethno-state.” One supporter operating as @StandUpWhiteMan retorted: “Dr David Duke’s account now suspended. Polite, truthful, intelligent opinions backed by facts are not allowed.” Another says: “David Duke, great American Patriot & Trump supporter has been suspended from Twitter. Just another example of Jew power over all of U.S,” @AdolfJBiden wrote: “Dr David Duke has been shoahed by the Jews running Twitter.” Which ever way you look, there is a constant divide between race, sexual preferance, and colour.

The Frankfurt School, referred to above , known more appropriately as Critical Theory, is a philosophical and sociological movement originally located at the Institute for Social Research at the Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany. The Institute was founded in 1923 thanks to a donation by Felix Weil with the aim of developing Marxist studies in Germany. (Félix José Weil was a Jewish German-Argentine millionaire who wished to push Marxism onto his host nation.) In 1933, the Nazis forced closed its Communist subversive activities, and the Institute was moved to the United States where it found hospitality at Columbia University in New York City where is could continue to subvert its new host nation. To complain is to be anti-Semitic rather than the Jewish subversion to be called Jewish supremist.

The Frankfurt School’s central conclusion was that it was impossible in the post-World-War era to rely only on Karl Marx’s economic analysis to explain the eternal class war. And so communism could not be imposed on the people by the Bolshevik method. They noted the advent of popular culture carried forward by mass media, including television, radio, music, and film for the rise of a new more complex and sophisticated form of class war. They set about imposing communism through media and culture in what is sometimes called “Cultural-Marxism”. These personages are the ultimate traitors to our Western culture as they are the originators and architects of the greatest misery mankind has yet known – Communism.

The term ‘Cultural Marxism’ refers to a theory that sees most of the anti-traditional cultural movements today as being rooted in a systematic Marxist plan to undermine Western society and to bring in a Marxist control of society. Various brands of logic are applied by one ethno-religious group to alter current culture and value system of another ethno-religious group so that the target ethno-religious group has its culture and value system replaced with a new one that reflects the interests of the attacking ethno-religious group that wishes to oppress the target ethno-religious group under the harshest of systems called communism. Even Putin described the Bolsheviks as being Jewish.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn complains that sixty-six million were killed by the Bolsheviks, so to go anywhere near communism is dangerous. But they killed Russians, and so Russians are regenerating and new Russians are born. Immigration changes the equation completely.

There is talk of the engineering of race replacement.

The above meme now has the message: “This Facebook post is no longer available. It may have been removed or the privacy settings of the post may have changed.

In multi-colour and multi-religion regions, a grouping is likely to concentrate on its own interests. Thus, Hispanic people will favour Hispanic politicians and Hispanic businesses and so forth. A politician is not voted for based on his ability and policies but on his colour or religion.

And the division increases.

Although the picture shows a white family and a mixed family, the meme states “Protect your race” which applies to any race. So I like Thai people for being Thai. I respect them for their ‘Thai-ness’. I respect the Japanese for being Japanese. Of interest, the Japanese have not been subjected to race-mixing. The war between the religions continues but not with swords, knives, or guns. The procedures developed on the invention of the printing press led to pamphleteering during the French Revolution have been moved into modern propaganda.

About the author


Leave a Comment