Sexual Revolution

Women and the Next Armagedon

Written by Andy

2019-01-17 by Andy Chalkley

Too many of my sisters had sided against the black man for money. When you are in need of protection and support, expect that same lack of loyalty.

The above meme is fascinating. You need to read it a few times until it sinks in.

If males do not get strict upbringing by their mothers, gender politics will move the power from females to males. The illusion is that women have gained equality, but the reality is the opposite. The problem is that this arrangement is going horribly wrong. Men will revert to violence and crime. Men who living in poverty or become socially excluded have a greater tendency toward violence.

Feminist vitriol has caused men to lose their compassion for women. Social order will break down. Men will be disinclined to stop the rape of women.

I was listening to Jordan Peterson as background noise and he said something close to “men tend towards order and women tend towards chaos.” Irrespective of the logic, the very threat of chaos in society is to be resisted. When chaos arrives, nobody will start a blame game on the male/female origin of the chaos. He talked of the perpetually battling forces of tyrannical order and chaos. If there is a female bent toward chaos, it could do with a bit more order and it may be that a request for male order to be enhanced. Males have lost their voice as a group under the vocal tyranny of feminism. Jordan Peterson moves on to saying:

“I think it that the fundamental threats that our society faces at present are from chaos — from the side of destabilisation — rather than from the side of tyranny.”

Here is a passage by Logic Man:

“In lot of religious texts women bring chaos into a situation and men order. Eve ate the apple and fucked up Eden. The Greek goddesses went around tempting everyone and playing tricks. …

…men roam around in tribes looking for weak villages to invade and then they take all the women and build a society but those women are still vulnerable to other roaming bans of men. So men must build defenses, defend the perimeter and make the village a safe place from nature and from other men (order). Women then have children which need tamed, fed and protected. So while women are helping the tribe that also bring chaos in the form of infants that need fed and protected. Women also always have the capacity to cause men to fight …

We can even fast forward today and overlay this archetype on modern male and female relationships. Women expend resources (chaos) and men go out and earn more income (order). Women tempt other men, or provide small tests for their current partners, or go through emotional drama (chaos) while men are charged with fending off suitors, passing tests and soothing emotional drama with logic reason and strength (order.) Women pop out more and more children and want more and more space and stability (chaos); men earn more, build more house, and provide rules and structure for more and more offspring (order.)

Healthy relationships have a balance between order and chaos and unhealthy relationships have too much of one or the other.

This is why men and women can hold such strong painfully beautiful bonds with each other. They are two independent beings that when fitted properly complement each other and make a strong unit fit for raising strong offspring.”

His jumps between order and chaos and male and female caused me to read it a few times. Irrespective of the logic, the chaos is to be feared. When a food system collapses after a money system collapse, chaos in an unpleasant way arrives. As the New York stock trader in the next seat from Stockholm to New York said: “When this goes wrong, we will be fighting in the streets over the last sandwich with machine-guns.” It was a memorable comment. He was referring to the next global financial crash which he was confident will happen. That is the ultimate chaos and girls will fare terribly. It is already happening as a tell-tale for what will happen under full collapse.

News outlets already have headlines such as: “Germany, Sweden, and other European countries are facing growing public unrest amid a wave of violent sexual assaults.” [1]

One commenter refers to history:

“The Swedes have already surrendered to their Muslim overlords by ignoring this brutal rape. The land that supposedly is a heaven of feminism is now a heaven for Muslim rapists who can enjoy raping the descendants of Viking women. If the Vikings knew what Sweden has turned into, their wrath would be insatiable. We can only wish for the Viking instincts to be awakened among the Swedes.”

That was in response to a report about a Muslim migrant gang rape of a white girl that included:

“The woman was gang-raped and also beaten up by up to twenty perpetrators. The woman was kicked, beaten, threatened with a knife and her head was knocked against the floor until she went unconscious. …

Several men are now charged with the crime. According to the prosecution, they also filmed the rape and laughed during their sexual abuse.

All of the rapists are reported to have a ‘migrant background’, the Swedish media’s expression for Muslim migrants.” [22]

Bibi Wilhailm, a German girl describes her personal experiences of Arab and Muslim migrants:

“so scared everywhere, for example if my family and I go out together, or if I see a movie with my friends. Usually I stay out until 6pm in winter, and it is so scary. It is just very hard to live day-to-day as a woman….

I ran all the way home. I was frightened for my life. There’s no other way to describe it.

I cannot understand why Germany is doing nothing! Why is Germany standing by, watching, and then doing nothing? Please explain, why. Men of Germany, these people are killing your children, they are killing your women.” [22]

This wording mirrors many situations where the police have become afraid to be labelled as ‘racist’ for taking a tough line on migrant crime. Occasionally, victims of migrant crime have been accused of ‘racism’ for being vocal.

The bright reader might recognize that this was the end game of feminism, the slow revolution that turns on the useful idiots, the gullible females that believed that they could gain by turning their wrath on males of their own ethnicity. the young writer is afraid to go out alone. Thus she is ‘chaperoned’ as in centuries gone by. A writer comments: “Europe and Germany are thus ruined. …we live in a social dictatorship.” She finishes with:

“Thank you, Angela Merkel, for killing Germany! I have no more respect for you, Merkel. I do not think you know what you have done. You do not see how our lives have changed. Open your eyes! Is this normal? Should I, a 16-year old who is almost 17, be so scared to walk outside my house? No, it is not normal. You have killed Germany!” [Miss Wilhailm]

Here is another report:

“Later reports state that after being raped by Muslim savages, the girl was tortured by them as they poured lighter fluid into her vagina, then set it on fire.” []

And another report:

“1 in 4 Swedish women will be raped.” []

This seems like the death of Europe. Muslims want to see Sharia law here where they will be able to rape European infidel women at will.

Even Angela Merkel called multiculturalism: “A Grand Delusion” or in the fuller version: “Multiculturalism leads to parallel societies, and therefore multiculturalism remains a grand delusion.” This multiculturalism is creating tribalism, which she calls ‘separate societies’. Separate tribes with different value systems where one tribe puts no value on the existence of the other tribe. We have created a multi-racial nightmare. This takes us back to the passage by Logic Man:

“…men roam around in tribes looking for weak villages to invade and then they take all the women and build a society but those women are still vulnerable to other roaming bands of men. So men must build defenses, defend the perimeter and make the village a safe place … from other men …”

The locals are the ‘weak tribes’ because they mistakenly think their governmental systems will look after their interests whilst the immigrants have set up a parallel governmental system through their religion and Sharia courts. Jewish people do similar by networking through their religion and considering themselves to be the ‘Chosen Ones’.

Merkel presided over a refugee intake that peaked at one million per year. She also says: “The approach [to build] a multicultural [society] and to live side-by-side and to enjoy each other … has failed, utterly failed.”

Angela Merkel stresses that refugees from these failed states should assimilate to German values and culture, and respect the country’s laws, yet the one thing that is clear is that these refugees do not assimilate, nor do they respect the German inhabitants, the culture and they do not respect the law.

The exceeding ease with which the perpetrators get away with the rapes has caused the public to accuse German police of pandering to ‘barbaric, Muslim, gang-raping hordes of men. The reality is that, under ‘Political Correctness’, the ‘sin’ of ‘Racism’ has been raised to a higher level than that of the rape of a white girl. There are dozens of cases where sex offenders have not been prosecuted because of legal loopholes. Two recent arrivals from Iraq were handed suspended one-year sentences for their part in the ‘Cologne night of rapes’. The concern over being accused of racism gave birth to false tolerance. The ‘thought police’ cannot accept that the evil is from another race. So a white man can lose his job for saying: “Hi!” in the wrong tone but an immigrant of another religion gets a suspended sentence for involvement in a violent rape. Those that control us clearly consider that the rape of a white girl takes a lower place than the possibility of upsetting a minority Muslim. The invisible crime of perceived racism has a higher station than the rape of insignificant white girls. The unwritten laws of ‘Political Correctness’ dictate that racism and perceived racism and the risk of offense to a Muslim are all more serious than the welfare of some raped white girl. ‘Political Correctness’ embodies a political and religious attitude that condemns any person that expresses even the mildest criticism of Islam or a ‘minority’ group. What has happened under Political Correctness and Social Justice is that the ‘sin’ of perceived racism has been raised to a higher level than the rape of a European white girl. The police are feared to investigate the rape of European white girls for fear of being accused of racism. Thus the accusation of racism has a higher level than the accusation of raping a European white girl. It goes further than this.

The organs of the elite including the propaganda press, praise every sign of ethnic pride that is not white or German, or Australian, or European. The dogma and propaganda are treated as unquestionable truth. Anyone who doubts this fake truth is derided. This has the effect that many well-intentioned Western politicians, human rights supporters, church leaders, and journalists have managed to turn Islam into an ideology that cannot be criticized, and any person that even makes a mild comment on the subject is fiercely declared to be ‘racist’ as if it is the ‘ultimate’ sin. Welcome to ‘Political Correctness’ and ‘Social Justice’. Feminism is being morphed into ‘Political Correctness’ and ‘Social Justice’ and the female Feminists will be ‘f**ked’. Yet it is the Muslims that are swelling the rapist statistics and they do it without the condemnation of other Muslims and without any action by the judiciary. So not only are the Muslims accepting of the rape of white girls, the police turn a blind eye from fear of committing the more serious phantom crime of racism and the judiciary ignores, absolves, or acts leniently to the perpetrators. We might as well tell the white girls that their power of ‘no’, granted under Christian Patriarchy, has now been revoked. ‘Political Correctness’ is of no benefit to the European girl and, although she may not realize it, feminism wasn’t either.

“Feminism has destroyed male resolve to protect women.”

White males are now too timid to act after their treatment at the hands of feminists. ‘Rape Culture’ is not and never was white male’s culture, but ‘rape’ of white girls is accelerating — but not by the feminized white males over whom white girls have been gloating. As the white males have been silenced but the frothing feminists, the fake Feminist claims of victimhood status will become a reality as the ‘Rape Culture’ of ‘immigrants’ meets no opposition from the previous defenders of white females — the white males.

The Politically Correct, Mayor of Cologne, Henriette Reker, said that women should adopt a ‘code of conduct’ to prevent future assault. This followed the sexual attack of women by 1000 men on New Year’s Eve. This is a bit soft after the verbal degradation of white males over the last forty years. This idiotic woman suggested that the code of conduct should include: “maintaining an arm’s length from strangers, sticking within your own group, asking bystanders for help or to intervene as a witness, or to inform the police if you are the victim of such an assault”. Real clever stuff. So now the focus has been shifted to the victims rather than the perpetrators. It is now a woman’s fault if she gets raped by an ‘immigrant’. White men get accused of ‘Eye Rape’ as in “He raped me with his eyes.” They have suffered under the generalizations: “All men are potential rapists.” and similar accusations. Yet, police statistics show that in the capital of Norway, Oslo, 100% of assault rapes between strangers were committed by ‘immigrant’ non-western males. This is a feminist quote: “To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he’s a machine, a walking dildo.” After so many years of verbally attacking Western males for perceived unwanted attention. A Western white man is derided for saying: “Good Morning”, but an ‘immigrant’ should not be arrested for rape for fear offending the ‘immigrant’. The Mayor’s suggestion was: “There’s always the possibility of keeping a certain distance of more than an arm’s length — that is to say to make sure yourself you don’t look to be too close to people who are not known to you, and to whom you don’t have a trusting relationship.” Thus, Western women must protect against ‘immigrant’ attackers but there is no demand that ‘immigrant’ attackers not rape! No male in my time would have allowed this to happen to women. Females will reap the harvest of their voting patterns by voting in wet rags like Henriette Reker and Angela Merkel. Put some real men there to ensure that women are looked after. A police spokesman described the events that evening as “a new dimension in crime”. Well, get used to it or put some real men back into power and stop voting for a person because they are ‘nice’. Vote for people that ‘get the job done’ irrespective of whether you like them. I, like most men, vote for the person that gets the job done irrespective of whether we like or detest them. Women vote for someone they like which damages democracy. This Henriette Reker is victim blaming. Those that funded and promoted feminism arranged for males to be denigrated, now they will do the same to European women under the banner of ‘Political Correctness’. It is simplistic thinking to assume that because the people of Europe are civilized then immigrants will be civilized. The first line of a websearch is: “First Rotherham: some 20 rapists, and 1200 victims.”

Let us consider one night, in one city, Cologne. Here is a police printout of a particularly horrendous series of attacks by male Muslim gangs on German girls. The list contains one fifteen minute section of the ‘Night of Rapes’. Some sources report one thousand rapes of German girls by male Muslim gangs on one night in one city alone, Cologne. I had wondered why there was such a large police presence at Cologne station last year. A local told me the reason. This is largely unreported by MSM (Mainstream Media).

The above list is for a period of a quarter of an hour on New Year’s Eve in Cologne, Germany. The attackers were generally reported to have been of ‘Middle Eastern appearance’. Similar mistreatment of German women occurred at the end of World War Two.

Such is the onslaught against the Caucasian male, that the local lads are not even rising up in support of the ‘damsels in distress’. You may notice that the above list is for fifteen minutes. You can imagine what the night created.

Although this next picture is a photoshopped picture, it shows the magnitude and heat generated by the subject.

Gangs in Sweden created from first and second generation immigrants create no go zones where police, fire, ambulance, wardens, and postal officers fear to enter. Their weapon of choice is the hand grenade. The gang wars are a constant reminder of Sweden’s failed migration and integration policies. The Spectator reports that:

“Firefighters face the same reality. In November, some 50 cars were torched in a garage in a mainly immigrant suburb in Uppsala. Despite citizens repeatedly calling the emergency services, it took three hours before the fire department showed up — protected by police equipped with riot gear and machine-guns.”

The people that live in these parallel immigrant communities greet representatives of the Swedish state, including paramedics, social workers, and librarians with hostility and aggression. The solving of crime becomes difficult because none will talk to the police. Even Swedish children as young as nine have been robbed at knife-point by masked immigrant gangs. Shootings have even occurred in pre-school yards.

This blogger’s inciteful opinion is illuminating:

Wristcel: “Feminist societies will collapse in two to three generations.” [Return of Kings]

What will happen to the women at the time of collapse? The Estonian World Review headlines:

“Muslims say they will make it legal to rape white women when they take over Europe.”

But all of this Muslim and Jewish attack on Christians is not new. I give you part of an article:

Muslim and Jewish slave trade and castration of the Slavs in the Middle Ages.
… history of the slave trade in medieval Europe. .. representatives of the “persecuted and the long-suffering people”!
In Europe, the slave trade was almost entirely Jewish. Goods come mainly from East Slavic lands. Bishop Agobard of Lyon (IX century AD.) mentions in his book (De insolentia Iudaeorum), number of cases where Jews kidnapped Christian Frank’s children, or even received from Christian children for sale and sold them to the Spanish Muslims.
Trafficking in slaves is connected, apparently, the resettlement of Jews in the city of Magdeburg. In the X century, Prague was the center of the slave trade. St. Adalbert resigned from in 989 bishop of Prague because was not able to buy all the Christians purchased by a Jewish merchant [Caro, Wirtschaftsgeschichte, I, str.191]. Jewish merchants brought Slavic slaves in Muslim countries. Women and girls were intended concubines in harems, and a young man, after castration, to the eunuchs. According to the laws of Islam and Muslims is forbidden castration provided this work to Jewish doctors. Medieval Arab historian al-Muqaddasi writes that the main supplier of white eunuchs in Muslim harems were Slavs. They are castrated, and then are transported to Egypt. Slavs brought to the Spanish cities, populated by Jews, and that they were castrated, and enjoyed a special reputation in this respect the Jews of Verdun [Dozy, Gesch. der Mauren, 2, p.38] As for the operation itself says castration medieval Arab historian Ibn al-Athir: “At the time of castration skrotum cut up and removed the testicles. Often, during this operation, boy is frightened and one testicle goes up. Doctor-Jew looking for him, but do not always find it possible, and then drop it when the cut is zarubtsuetsya.” [Ibn al-Athir, IX, page 39].

Only a small portion of the slaves survived after such an operation.

Jewish Merchants

“Records of long-distance Jewish slave merchants date at least as far back as 492. By the turn of the 6th to the 7th century, Jews had become the chief slave traders in Italy, and were active in Gaelic territories. By the 9th and 10th centuries, Jewish merchants, sometimes called Radhanites, were a major force in the slave trade continent-wide.” [1996, The Moscow Publishing House, Adam Metz ‘Muslim Renaissance’.]

Do not expect the situation to get better. I give you the drama to prepare you for the future. You clearly did not learn from your storytelling of the Pied Piper. Beware of the Pied Piper!

A female Islamic professor sparked a controversy when she claimed that Allah makes permissible for Muslim men to rape non-Muslim women in order to ‘humiliate’ them. The astonishing claim was made by Suad Saleh, who is a professor from Al-Azhar University, Egypt during an interview on Al-Hayat TV. According to an editorial in the German newspaper Westfalen-Blatt, police hush-up crimes involving refugees and migrants because they do not want to give legitimacy to critics of mass Muslim immigration. Look at this mass of migrants. Do you notice that they are all male?

The feminists that decry sexism allow predominantly male migrants into Europe whilst females make up more than half the world’s refugees. Some reports suggest that females are seventy to eighty percent of the total refugees in the world. [17] If there is something for the feminists to squawk about, it is the problems of violence directed against females in the vulnerable position in destabilized societies and in refugee situations such as camps. This violence is accentuated by their unprotected movement into strange environments. Female refugees become particularly vulnerable to rape, abduction, sexual harassment, physical violence, and the incitement to give ‘sexual favours’. These female refugees tend to be the most vulnerable. Males tend to be the major abusers of women but, in appropriate circumstances, they are the greatest protectors of females. The Western male needs to be turned into the protector of Western females.

In Telford, UK, hundreds of girls, some as young as eleven, were raped, drugged, and beaten by gangs of males of mainly Muslim, Asian-heritage males. They got little air-time in the fake news channels whilst the ‘MeToo’ movement set about deposing any male that had consensual sex for perks with success-obsessed female job aspirants.

The abuse of girls in Telford by Muslim males is estimated to have involved more than one thousand girls over a period of forty years. They were passed around like toys. Some became pregnant, had abortions, which made them available again for further rape. Three women were murdered and two others died in situations linked to the abuse. These shocking events received negligible coverage. Somebody’s knee touched by a white male was a far more serious event. A massive $16 million was raised in less than a month to attack white males who had been accused of casting-couch type sex by high profile women. Nothing for the poor girls of Telford. Why are the journalists abandoning the plight of girls raped, battered, and abused by Muslim males and attacking white males that had advantageous sex with success-driven girls that were prepared to drop their knickers for in exchange for fame? George, a brewery owner, made this comment: “If a girl drops her knickers for advancement, she’s a whore.” They may have been verbally pressured to have sex, but they could have said: “No!”. The power of women over men in civilised society allows women to say: “No”. When civilized society breaks down, women lose the power of ‘no’. Journalists prefer #MeToo victims to be posh and the perpetrator to be portrayed as white males, even though Harvey Weinstein is Jewish.

The abuse by Muslim men damages the deviously constructed feminist war against white males — the white patriarchy. The potential for racism comments carries more leverage than some unknown poor white girls raped by ‘immigrants’. Telford had the wrong type of victims and the wrong type of perpetrators. Tribal hatreds are a fascinating item to stoke. Stoke it one way — stoke it the other way. It didn’t fit the ‘white male = bad’ narrative needed for the destruction of Europe. Denigrate the white male — and leave the white girl unprotected. It appears not to be a criminal offense to turn a blind eye to abuse of white girls? Here is another comment: “The fear of naming the religion of the perpetrators of these rape gangs has overcome any sense of accountability and decency towards the victims.” The fake news corporations soften the subject by calling the perpetrators: “Muslim ‘grooming gangs’ ”. This suggests they groomed gullible foolish females. In reality, as Jules Gomes states, this is “rape of the innocents on an industrial scale”. It was organized pre-meditated ‘gang rape’ by gangs of Muslim males that carefully planned and executed their crimes. The fear of naming the religion of the perpetrators has overridden justice. ‘Political Correctness’ will not serve the good ordinary citizens of Europe. Political Correctness will not protect Western white women. Political Correctness combined with Social Justice will be the method by which Feminism will cause the oppression of the normal people. Thus the justice system is also treating the girls as ‘White Trash’. Political Correctness has ‘elevated’ the ‘sin’ of racism and the ‘sin’ of offending a minority Muslim to a higher level than the rape of a white girl. In fact, it is more than that. The possibility of offending a Muslim is a higher level sin than the rape of thousands of white Christian girls. The police are so feared of breaking the new ‘Political Correctness’ rules that they don’t investigate the rape of white girls when a Muslim is a suspect. Politicians, generally, are in the grip of feminism, gynocentrism, ‘Political Correctness’, and ‘Social Justice’. Those who might oppose fail to speak out against these ideologies.

The conviction rate for sexual assault against women is very low. Even in the United Kingdom, only six percent of rape allegations result in a conviction. This is a lower rate than for other forms of violent crime. The Guardian columnist Julia Bindel commented: “rape might as well be legal”. The ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ requirement of evidence is one impediment. The possibility of false claims of rape after consensual sex feeds the ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ conundrum. In the UK, it is estimated that more than seventy-five percent of rapes are never reported. My arithmetic says that only one and a half percent of rape allegations result in a prosecution. However, there are far too many stories of false rape allegations to be too factual about this.

The collapse of the European empires caused by the purposely created World War One rendered Europe as a ‘dusty collection of dead empires’. In the words of one blogger: “These new arrivals are the maggots in the corpses.”

And some more wise words from:

Camille Paglia: “When social controls weaken, man’s innate cruelty bursts forth. The rapist is created not by bad social conditioning influences but by a failure of social conditioning. Feminists, seeking to drive power relations out of sex, have set themselves against nature.”

Carefully consider what Camille has said. It is not bad social conditioning of the adult male that causes the problem. It is the failure of social conditioning of the young male by mothers. It is too late to socially condition an adult male, you can only put him in prison after he has committed an offense. (Spot that! — The rapist goes to jail after he has raped someone.) But there is a second problem — the Politically Correct court operating on the principles of ‘Social Justice’ may decide that he is ‘Socially Disadvantaged’ enough to get away with his crime. Muslims in Europe are using this reasoning: “I’m disadvantaged. I can fuck who I want!”

Social conditioning has to be done when the boy is very young by his mother. Males have to be brought up in the best environment possible to ensure the safety of females. In other words, they must be trained young. Some feminists are no longer training their male offspring appropriately.

Immigrants are prone to follow different value systems that do not value Christians and those from different religions to their own. Christianity follows ‘Goodwill to all mankind’. At Christmas, you do not say: “Are you Christian?” If so: “Merry Christmas!” If not: “Sod off!” It is Good Will to all persons. Other religions tend to follow ‘Goodwill to their religion’ and some religions teach their young to treat those of other religions with contempt. Here is one of many examples: One of the Boko Haram said, “You’re not ready to convert to Islam, so I’m going to teach you a lesson.” He then drowned her three-year-old son in a nearby river. Welcome to Nigeria! One report is titled, ‘Armed gangs wipe out fifteen villages in mass Christian slaughter in Nigeria’. While this mass slaughter of Christians is taking place, the ‘Politically Correct’ media causes an interesting effect in the West. A Rasmussen report found that, in the U.S. “Women are more likely than men to think most American Muslims are mistreated here but less likely to believe Christians are mistreated in the Islamic world. Nearly as many voters under forty think most Muslims are mistreated in America (51%) as think most Christians are mistreated in the Muslim world (57%).” Yet persecution of Christians by Muslims is constant and violent. Death as Punishment for ‘Disbelief’ is normal. The religions simply do not mix well. I rather like what Gadhafi said: “It is better to have only one religion in a nation.”

A simple search for ‘Mass slaughter of Christians’ gives many sentences:

  • “The mass slaughter of Christians in Nigeria is calculated genocide abetted by the government in the nation that is Africa’s most Christian.”
  • “Middle East Christians suffer genocide, the world just finger-wags.”
  • “The slave Blandina is thrown by a bull in the arena at Lyon (Lugdunum), but the animal’s attack fails to kill her. Having endured unspeakable torture for several days, she has refused to deny her faith and is eventually stabbed to death, the final victim of the persecution of the summer of A.D. 177.” [21]
  • “Where will the systematic and unchallenged persecution of Christian communities in the Middle East by the Islamic State stop? Will it be at the dismantlement of every church, and the slaughter of every churchgoer? Or will it be at the exodus of all members of those communities, forced to flee certain death and torment? Unfortunately, these are two very probable scenarios given the complete inactiveness of world leaders — from the Kremlin, White House, Downing Street” [Cécilia Attias]
  • “Last Sunday, Islamic State suicide bombers turned two Coptic Christian churches in Egypt into scenes of unimaginable horror. Forty-four worshipers celebrating Palm Sunday were brutally ripped apart by bombs and left burning to death, leaving behind church walls and pews stained with innocent blood and torn bodies left lying lifeless.” [Cécilia Attias]
  • “Four out of every five people killed for religious reasons worldwide are Christians.” [écilia Attias]
  • “Hindu attacks against Christians is on the rise just seven years after 100 Christians were killed and 56000 left homeless.” [Christian Post]
  • “Hindu Extremism Rising 7 Years After Mass Slaughter of Christians.” [Christian Post]
  • “The persecution and genocide of Christians across the world is worse today ‘than at any time in history’, and Western governments are failing to stop it.” [Newsweek]
  • “Not only are Christians more persecuted than any other faith group, but ever-increasing numbers are experiencing the very worst forms of persecution.” [Aid to the Church in Need]
  • “The report examined the plight of Christians in China, Egypt, Eritrea, India, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria and Turkey over the period lasting from 2015 until 2017. The research showed that in that time, Christians suffered crimes against humanity, and some were hanged or crucified. The report found that Saudi Arabia was the only country where the situation for Christians did not get worse, and that was only because the situation couldn’t get any worse than it already was.” [Newsweek]
  • “Why don’t we hear about persecuted Christians?” [Natasha Moore]
  • “… the summary execution of North Koreans caught with Bibles.” [Natasha Moore]
  • “The particular minority group I am referring are the Christians of northern Iraq. For the first time in perhaps 1,600 years, no Christian service has been held in Mosul in recent weeks. Observers believe no Christians now remain in Iraq’s second-largest city after the Islamic State militants controlling the city gave them an ultimatum: convert to Islam, pay an (unaffordable) tax, or face death. (The tax option was later revoked.) Terrible stories of brutal persecution are filtering through.” [Natasha Moore]
  • “Christians are persecuted in 139 nations around the world.” [Natasha Moore]
  • “Countries that were previously moderate or avowedly secular have stepped up their hostility to Christians, such as Turkey, where over the last century the Christian presence has dwindled from 32% of the population to a tiny minority of 0.15 per cent.” [Natasha Moore]
  • “The Al Shabaab are now hunting down the children in Mogadishu, and we have moved the care center to a bit safer location…. The children look devastated and malnourished, so we as a secret church do appeal to our brothers and sisters in the free world to consider extending a hand to these persecuted children.” [Pastor of an underground church, Somalia.]

Welcome to the Islamification of European countries.

(Tariq Ramadan, Professor Islamic Studies, Oxford. We are not here to adopt Western values, we are here to colonise the US and Canada, and spread Islamic Sharia Law. Canada has one of the easiest legal systems to penetrate and advance Sharia from within — but if that doesn’t work, we won’t hesitate to use violent Jihad.)

Now you know what you can look forward to. This is part of Pauline Hanson’s maiden speech:

“Australia is predominantly a Christian country, but our government is secular. Our Constitution prevents governments from imposing religious rule and teachings. The separation of church and state has become an essential component of our way of life, and anything that threatens that separation threatens our freedom. Australia has embraced migrants from all different races, making us one of the most multiracial nations on earth. Most have assimilated and are proud to call themselves Australians, accepting our culture, beliefs and laws. I welcome them from the bottom of my heart. As they integrate and assimilate, the disruption caused by diversity diminishes.

Why then has Islam and its teachings had such an impact on Australia like no other religion? Islam sees itself as a theocracy. Islam does not believe in democracy, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, or freedom of assembly. It does not separate religion and politics. It is partly a religion, but it is much more than that. It has a political agenda that goes far outside the realm of religion. It regulates Muslims’ social and domestic life, their legal system and politics – their total life.

Australia is now seeing changes in suburbs predominantly Muslim. Tolerance towards other Australians is no longer the case. Our law courts are disrespected and prisons have become breeding grounds for Muslims to radicalise inmates. Muslims are imprisoned at almost three times the average rate. The rate of unemployed and public dependency is two to three times greater than the national average. Muslims are prominent in organised crime, with associated violence and drug dealing. Antisocial behaviour is rampant, fuelled by hyper-masculine and misogynist culture. Multiple social surveys find that neighbourhoods of Muslim settlement are suffering from collapsing social cohesion and fear of crime. Australians, in general, are more fearful.”

This graph poo-hoos those that heckled when she says: “We are a Christian country.” Pauline Hanson has said that Islam is not a religion of peace but of ideology.

We should not forget the sixty-six million Christians killed by the Bolsheviks in The Soviet Union. American historian Edwin Schoonmaker wrote in his book: ‘Democracy and World Dominion’:

“Fifteen years after the Bolshevist Revolution was launched to carry out the Marxist program, the editor of the American Hebrew could write: ‘According to such information that the writer could secure while in Russia a few weeks ago, not one Jewish synagogue has been torn down, as have hundreds — perhaps thousands of the Greek Catholic Churches… In Moscow and other large cities one can see Christian churches in the process of destruction… the Government needs the location for a large building,’ (American Hebrew, Nov. 18, 1932, p. 12) Apostate Jews, leading a revolution that was to destroy religion as the ‘opiate of the people’ had somehow spared the synagogues of Russia.” [Democracy and World Dominion 1939, P211]

As Germany was overrun at the end of World War Two, a Soviet war correspondent said:

“The Russian soldiers were raping every German female from eight to eighty. It was an army of rapists”

(A German girl being led from a Berlin train station — having been gang-raped.)

Germany was a defeated nation in 1945. With no men to protect them, these German women suffered mass rape.

In 1945 Berlin women relied on the mercy of the Soviet soldiers for food. From the hungry or the homeless, sexual favours could be bought for a few coins or a small quantity of food.

Austin Joseph App says that the Allies raped more German women than had ever before been raped through history. German women were raped by members of the Russian, Polish, French and American forces during and at the end of World War II. During their flight to the West and the period of expulsions, German girls and women were also raped by Czechs, Serbians, and Slovenians. Millions of German women and girls were ravished. Berlin became a city with almost no men. The German women and girls were considered fair game. In Danzig, a Catholic priest stated:

“They violated even eight-year-old girls and shot boys who tried to shield their mothers.”

One blogger thinks it may happen to Europe sooner than many think:

North Angle: “When the Muzzies take over the reset button will be pressed with a vengeance!” [14]

Here is another poster’s rant:
Adrian: Muslims will go down in history as the people who f%*€d Christians in the rear and they couldn’t see it coming. 2050 any 3rd/5th grade school. Teacher comes in: “Allahu Akbar students. Let’s open the history book. Aaah, today we will talk about my favorite chapter in history. The fallout of the Islamophobic empire, the end of the Westernized Christians. The battle that was won without a fight, without weapons. We only used diversion and our penises. Allahu Akbar. What did we gain out of this? We got to make all women worldwide look like garbage bags and made everybody pray five times a day.”
“Sir, sir, but the western society was flourishing and innovative.”
“True Saeed, but now you can marry as many wives as you want, as young as nine, torture them if needed and have sex slaves. Can you imagine having just one wife and not be able to touch her without consent. Allahu Akbar”
The Armenian Genocide, also known as the Armenian Holocaust, was the Ottoman government’s systematic extermination of one and a half million Christians. The genocide was carried out during and after World War I and implemented in two phases — the wholesale killing of the able-bodied male population through massacre and subjection of army conscripts to forced labour, followed by the deportation of women, children, the elderly, and the infirm on death marches leading to the Syrian Desert. Driven forward by military escorts, the deportees were deprived of food and water and subjected to periodic robbery, rape, and massacre. [15]
ISIS has made strong public statements about their intention to eliminate Christians from its ‘Islamic State’. Murder and rape are their tools. Francis and Patriarch Kirill report that “whole families, villages, and cities of our brothers and sisters in Christ are being completely exterminated.”
Christians are more persecuted now than at any time in recent history according to the Vatican.
The only way that there can be cooperation between male and female is for the mothers to train the young males to subordinate themselves to females in the home, but to compete with males outside of the home. This was the system that resulted from Jesus’ insistence on monogamy and lifelong marriages. Males start to behave when they bond with a woman. They direct their energies toward the support of a wife and family. If the males are not split up, they may bond into troublesome troupes and cause problems in society. I give you these notes:
EqualityNow: “Around the world, rape and sexual abuse are everyday violent occurrences — affecting close to a billion women and girls over their lifetimes. However, despite the pervasiveness of these crimes, laws are insufficient, inconsistent, not systematically enforced and, sometimes, promote violence.” [2]
Laws are not enough to tame the males. Training is required at their most influential age — when they are little boys.
Economist: “South Africa’s rape epidemic. In a survey, 38% of men in one township admit to having used force or threats to obtain sex” [3]
Wikipedia: “During the 2015/2016 New Year’s Eve celebrations, there were mass sexual assaults, twenty-four alleged rapes, and numerous thefts in Germany, mainly in Cologne city center. … For all of Germany, police report that 1,200 women were sexually assaulted and estimate that at least 2,000 men were involved, acting in groups. … All of the incidents involved women being surrounded and assaulted by groups of men on the street. Police reported that the perpetrators were men of ‘Arab or North African appearance’ and said that Germany had never experienced such mass sexual assaults before.” [4]
It takes more than a few rules to stop this. According to André Schulz, the head of the Association of Criminal Police, up to ninety percent of the sex crimes committed in Germany in 2014 do not appear in the official statistics. [5] According to the Minister of Justice Heiko Maas, only one in ten rapes in Germany is reported and just eight percent of rape trials result in convictions. By calculation, eight percent of one in ten is less than one percent. Thus, I conclude that less than one percent of sex crimes result in sentences. [5] Many perpetrators receive lenient sentences. [5]
There is one error. Germany had an epidemic of sexual assaults at the end of WW2. Various reports quote that up to two million German women were raped by allied soldiers.
(German girls in World War Two.)

That is our side. Some reports have titles such as: “They raped every German female from eight to eighty”. It was mainly the Russian troops that committed the rapes but the other nations were significantly involved. However, our nations were allied to the Russians, so we are jointly responsible. Remember that Russia had recently been through the Bolshevik coup d’état. Girls in the above image would have been lucky to escape rape and may have been raped numerous times. Their males were not there to protect them. Younger German males were dead or incarcerated in fenced compounds that latter got the name: ‘Eisenhower’s Death Camps’. Reports have it that one million German soldiers died in these camps — after the end of hostilities.

(Dead German girl in World War Two.)

Hsu-Ming Teo: “During the 1945 Battle for Berlin and in the immediate post-war period, approximately one in three Berlin women were raped by Allied troops — mostly from the Red Army — while 10,000 women in Berlin died from sexual assault. Many women committed suicide after rape, …” [6]

The 2016 girls of Cologne are unlikely to get the support of their male counterparts as the male resolve has been eroded by years of media-driven anti-male onslaught.

There is little chance of transporting this:

(Mob of African males.)

into Europe without problems towards European women who are advertised to the world as this:

Girls have achieved economic independence from males by using economic dependence on the state in the form of welfare where the bulk of the tax is paid by males. Before the marriage revolution came to America, it came to Russia. It was enforced on Russia as a result of the Bolshevik coup d’état. It was reinvented for the West and implemented by popular propaganda. Although very few women identify as feminists, the few that do are broadcast to give the concept that the beliefs are widely held. The whole nation is then run on the political ideology of Feminism and its attack dogs: ‘Political Correctness’ and ‘Social Justice’. Few support this but the few that do get centre stage in the media where it is falsely portrayed as the popular ideology. Under these falsely propagandized ideologies, firstly the males suffer, then the females suffer. The economic independence from males in the West also relied on using economic dependence on the state and the procedure is close to the procedures encouraged after the Bolshevik forceful takeover of Russia. Lenin described the Bolshevik action in this manner:

“We would be deceiving both ourselves and the people if we concealed from the masses the necessity of a desperate, bloody war of extermination, as the immediate task of the coming revolutionary action.” [7]

The extermination started with abortion and planned parenthood and continued with the immigration of other tribes. Lenin (Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov) also wrote:

“Social-Democracy must recognize this mass terror and incorporate it into its tactics, organizing and controlling it, of course, subordinating it to the interests and conditions of the working-class movement and the general revolutionary struggle.” [8]

So that you have no doubt that the Bolshevik coup d’état was not a popular overthrow of Russia, in the same magazine he wrote:

“The phenomenon in which we are interested is the armed struggle. It is conducted by individuals and by small groups. Some belong to revolutionary organizations, while others (the majority in certain parts of Russia) do not belong to any revolutionary organization. Armed struggle pursues two different aims, which must be strictly distinguished: in the first place, this struggle aims at assassinating individuals, chiefs and subordinates in the Army and police; in the second place, it aims at the confiscation of monetary funds both from the government and from private persons. The confiscated funds go partly into the treasury of the party, partly for the special purpose of arming and preparing for an uprising, and partly for the maintenance of persons engaged in the struggle we are describing. The big expropriations (such as the Caucasian, involving over 200,000 rubles, and the Moscow, involving 875,000 rubles) went in fact first and foremost to revolutionary parties — small expropriations go mostly, and sometimes entirely, to the maintenance of the ‘expropriators’.” [The thugs put it in their own pockets.] [8]

After the October Bolshevik coup d’état, Russia was swept by a three-year civil war between the so-called ‘White Army’, assembled by Tsarist generals, and the Red Army led by Trotsky. In other words, they had to fight their way across Russia to impose their communism. Thus, it was never a popular revolution. It was enforced. In 1918, Lenin ordered militants to add Tsar Nicholas II and his family, including his three children to his execution list. It took three years of intense fighting for the invading Bolsheviks to conquer and impose communism on the rest of the nation and they did not shrink from committing bloody crimes, murders, and tortures against any opponent.

(Nicholas II of Russia with the family (left to right): Olga, Maria, Nicholas II, Alexandra Fyodorovna, Anastasia, Alexei, and Tatiana. Livadiya, 1913.)

Lenin had admired the Jacobin violence in the French Revolution where the guillotine became the most potent political tool.

Jacobin violence in the French Revolution.

The Bolsheviks had taken the unwilling nation power by force, they burnt the Tsarist law books and set about undermining the culture. For tens of centuries, the relationships within the family had been held together by traditional sexual morality. These were broken and a new sexual revolution was underway. The new sexual permissiveness was sold as individual freedom. This component of communism was pushed into the west as: “It’s your body. You can do what you like with it.” The traditional morality was designed to produce children of undisputed paternity and to provide a secure family for the raising of children. Trotsky said: “You cannot abolish the family; you have to replace it.” The Bolsheviks set about undermining the economic necessity for the family. They undermined sexual morality and they provided alternative support mechanisms for the mother and child. Unfortunately, they did not work too well as no-one looks after a child like the biological parents. Alexandra Kollontai said that sexual freedom meant that relationships would be “purified of all material elements, of all money consideration” Attraction, affection, and choice would be the sole constituents of partnership. There was legislative reform as the old marriage traditions were discarded. The 1918 family code introduced by Commissar for Social Welfare, Alexandra Kollontai, forcefully removed the religious basis of marriage and handed it to the state as has now happened in the West. Vigorous propaganda campaigns condemned religion as a fraud. Marriage became a secular state contract between two individuals. Marriages could be dissolved very easily by either party. The 1918 liberalization of divorce law caused an explosive effect on the divorce rate which grew to exceed the marriage rate. Marriage and the family were falling apart and people became reliant on the state rather than the Christian Church and the family. Child Support Agencies were created by the Bolsheviks as an attack on the nuclear family. The Bolsheviks regarded the family as a fundamental unit of capitalism to be destroyed. Under the bizarre logic of ensuring equality between women and men, the support unit for both was destroyed. In so doing, the support unit for children was destroyed. Nobody looks after a child better than its biological parents. Nobody gives unconditional love as a biological parent. Here are some words from Alexandra Kollontai:

“There is no point in not facing up to the truth: the old family in which the man was everything and the woman nothing, the typical family where the woman had no will of her own, no time of her own and no money of her own, is changing before our very eyes.”

She also has this to say:

“The circumstances that held the family together no longer exist. The family is ceasing to be necessary either to its members or to the nation as a whole. The old family structure is now merely a hindrance.”


“The working woman will not have to slave over the washtub any longer, or ruin her eyes in darning her stockings and mending her linen; …”

She can dig ditches in the icy cold:

(Soviet Women)


“Communism liberates women from her domestic slavery and makes her life richer and happier.”

Life in a home is not slavery. Factory work is slavery. And:

“But here too, the workers’ state will come to replace the family, society will gradually take upon itself all the tasks that before the revolution fell to the individual parents.”

The revolution was not popular. And:

“There is no escaping the fact: the old type of family has had its day. The family is withering away not because it is being forcibly destroyed by the state, but because the family is ceasing to be a necessity. The state does not need the family, because the domestic economy is no longer profitable: the family distracts the worker from more useful and productive labour. The members of the family do not need the family either, because the task of bringing up the children which was formerly theirs is passing more and more into the hands of the collective. In place of the old relationship between men and women, a new one is developing: a union of affection and comradeship, a union of two equal members of communist society, both of them free, both of them independent and both of them workers. No more domestic bondage for women.”

The last words “both of them workers. No more domestic bondage for women.” sounds remarkably like the feminist’s “You can be freed from the kitchen and get a job working in a factory.” Working in a factory is not ‘freedom’. Domestic life is not ‘bondage’. How do women fall for this illogic?

The rapidly changed social relations altered the nature of marriage even in rural areas. This ushered in an era of promiscuity, fatherlessness, abortion, and promiscuity. For the first time, women had the legal status and material support to live independent lives. This brought the concept that love could be freed of material considerations with the crude idea that sex could be reduced to physical satisfaction. This ignores the individual’s duty to society and the creation of offspring. If one lives in a society, one cannot just do as one pleases. One has responsibilities to the society that produced and trained you. This is passed from generation to generation by parents and community which is represented by the local religion. The morals of the people had been embodied in a code of purity, hygiene, and self-discipline. Alexandra Kollontai was effectively a revolutionary who was focused on the destruction of the old sexual order which included its legal and religious constraints on sexual and family life. Peasants expressed heated resentment of the revolutionary line on marriage, divorce, and women’s equality. Don’t ever forget that this was not a ‘popular revolution’ but an enforced regime masquerading as a revolutionary government. There were massive peasant revolts all over Russia which threatened Bolshevik power. The Bolsheviks eliminated, by legal and physical means, any challenge or resistance to their absolute power. In every city that they entered, the Bolsheviks killed those not receptive to their ideology and committed acts of excessive savagery intended to instill fear. One Denikin commission report contained: “corpses with hands cut off, broken bones, heads ripped off, broken jaws, and genitals removed.”

Continued poverty and high female unemployment made women’s economic independence a distant dream. Sexual crime flourished, along with prostitution. Males were taking wives and divorcing them. There were large volumes of homeless children that were turning to crime. The problem of unmarried mothers became acute. To students, sex became a cheap amusement. In the early days of Communism, the theory was that children should be reared and cared for by the State. It soon became clear that the State was incapable of doing so. There were thousands of illegitimate children who had been abandoned to the streets.

The damage to the family unit had been achieved. Despite years of revolutionary sexual propaganda, sexual freedom was sexual freedom for men. Men would marry and divorce and remarry but married women would tend to stay divorced. Males that had lived peacefully with their wives for many years suddenly demanded divorces so that they could take younger wives. Men would say: “We have freedom now. Give me a divorce.”

This damage to the family took gender relations back two thousand years to before the time of Jesus and his rigid discipline on marriage embodied in ‘Christian Patriarchy’. The Christian Patriarchy, of course, allowed women to put great demands on males, whilst putting few demands on women. The sexual revolution created an immense demand for abortion. Rather than being freed, women were given a triple burden: involvement in paid productive labour in the public sphere, unpaid reproductive labour in the private home, and child-rearing — now with reduced help from encumbered males. The same has happened in the Sexual Revolution in the West. Women were encouraged into the workforce under the propaganda: “Women can do anything.”

In 1926, ‘The Atlantic’ magazine worded it this way:

“The peasant villages have perhaps suffered most from this revolution in sex relations. An epidemic of marriages and divorces broke out in the country districts. Peasants with a respectable married life of forty years and more behind them suddenly decided to leave their wives and remarry. Peasant boys looked upon marriage as an exciting game and changed wives with the change of seasons. It was not an unusual occurrence for a boy of twenty to have had three or four wives, or for a girl of the same age to have had three or four abortions. As the peasants of Borisovo-Pokrovskoie bitterly complained: ‘Abortions cover our villages with shame. Formerly we did not even hear of them.’ But the women, in self-defence, replied: ‘It’s easy for you to talk. But if you just tried to bear children yourselves you would sing a different song.’ ” [9]

Here is one fascinating paragraph from the Atlantic article about the faithfulness of upwardly mobile males:

“A working woman from Kostroma, with a shawl over her head, added her voice of general chorus of opposition. ‘In our factories,’ she said, ‘you notice something very unpleasant. As long as a young man doesn’t participate in public activities he respects his wife. But as soon as he moves up a little, gets a little more education, something comes between them. He leaves his wife with a child, lives with another woman, and brings poverty and misery to both. I ask the working women to pass a law that will stop the practice of having many husbands and many wives.’ ” [9]

The article has the following comment:

“ ‘Some men have twenty wives, living a week with one, a month with another,’ asserted an indignant woman delegate during the sessions of the Tzik. ‘They have children with all of them, and these children are thrown on the street for lack of support!’ ” [9]

A law to abolish marriage was opposed with these reasons:

  1. that it would abolish marriage;
  2. that it would destroy the family;
  3. that it would legalize polygamy and polyandry;
  4. that it would ruin the peasants.

Other comments in the report include:

  • “Abortions cover our villages with shame. Formerly we did not even hear of them.”
  • “…he had forced her to ask for a divorce only two months after they had been married.”
  • “She was divorced by her husband after their first child was born. He then married another woman, had a child by her, deserted both, and returned to his first wife, by whom he had a second child.”
  • “Other peasants took advantage of the loose divorce regulations to acquire ‘summer brides.’ As the hiring of labor in Russia is hedged about with difficulties and restrictions for the private employer, the richer peasants in some districts took to the practice of marrying a strong girl for the harvest season and divorcing her as soon as the work in the fields was over.”
  • “Some members of the League of Communist Youth, an organization which now numbers between a million and a half and two million young men and women, regard the refusal to enter into temporary sex relations as mere bourgeois prejudice, the deadliest sin in the eyes of a Communist.”
  • “Unless some firm limit is placed on frequent marriages and divorces we shall be discussing this question at every session and never get good results.”
  • “It was his view that stable marriages would better ensure the education of the children. He asserted that the break-up of the family was responsible for many of the criminal and beggar children now on the streets.”
  • “Free love is the ultimate aim of a socialist State; in that State marriage will be free from any kind of obligation…”
  • “Women don’t get a hundredth part of the alimony to which they are entitled by court decisions because the husbands simply cannot pay. The proposed law seems to favor women, but it will really work out to their disadvantage, because even now husbands run away from their wives and wives run vainly after their husbands and their alimony.”
  • “You say we can put alimony defaulters in prison, but if we tried to do this we shouldn’t have enough prisons to hold the guilty. ”
  • “…she did not think women could collect alimony, especially if their husbands had two families. ”
  • “This would provide a fund of about sixty million dollars a year, enough to provide for all the babies who might be born as a result of free-love unions.”
  • “as a result of numerous suggestions to the effect that some Russian men are so lazy that they would be glad to marry working women and remain permanently unemployed if they were thereby entitled to claim support from their wives”
  • “The course of the discussion indicated pretty clearly two outstanding developments in modern Russia’s attitude toward the problems of marriage, sex, and the family. In the first place, there is an unmistakable reaction, both among the Communists and among the general public, against excessive loose living. … In the second place, it is now pretty evident that the widespread circulation of revolutionary ideas on the desirability of abolishing the family has not by any means eliminated old-fashioned passions of love and jealousy.”
  • “Among the general population and especially among the peasants there is a keen realization of the difficulties, material and otherwise, which have come up as a result of a too literal adoption of the ‘free love’ slogan, and there is a desire for more stable domestic relations.”
  • “The police records are full of cases, some of them very terrible, of murders and assaults and suicides committed by women under the influence of jealousy.”

Joseph Stalin maneuvered himself into power and, within a few years, reversed many of these destructive family policies. In 1936 Stalin’s Communist Party claimed that the Bolshevik’s dismantling of the family structure with its strict gender roles, had been a mistake. They reinstated to the ideology of the family on a socialist basis. Divorce became a bureaucratic ordeal, complete with a waiting period and fees were imposed. Abortion was recriminalized In 1942, single persons and childless couples were to pay higher rates of taxation. From 1944, the state refused to recognize common law marriage.

Even masturbation became taboo under Stalinist sexual morality. Masturbation became an issue to be prevented and the result statements such as:

“all auto erotic processes, moments of self-satisfaction that do not require contact with another, occasion a pathological increase in ego-centrism and produce shy loners impressed in themselves and unconcerned with the life of society” [4]

In the modern world, our young males are becoming ‘shy loners’ and are avoiding contact with girls.

The modern version of the Bolshevik-created-problem is occurring with current single mothers. A common avenue to single motherhood is by obtaining pregnancy with a casual relationship. Some of these are by fraudulent use of a condom with a hole. This method is being damaged by fathers’ rights activists demanding legislation to protect men’s right to parent their biological children. The woman may end up co-parenting with a male for which she had the fling. Males are also getting suspicious of the intention of women on one-night-stands. A young man gave me this advice one night: “Don’t trust a condom given to you by a woman. It might have a hole in it.”

Even women who resort to the alternative by using an anonymous donor insemination program are not insulated from dealing with the father. Interested teenagers may conduct DNA search to locate the father.

Here is the ‘Open Doors USA’ list the top ten countries for extreme persecution of Christians. North Korea, Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sudan, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Eritrea. Egypt is pretty dreadful towards its Christians, but it only ranks as number 21. This organization is focused on serving persecuted Christians and claims that nearly 215 million Christians face high persecution, with 100 million of those being in Asia. Open Doors USA claims that: “Christians remain one of the most persecuted religious groups in the world. … Christians throughout the world continue to risk imprisonment, loss of home and assets, torture, beheadings, rape, and even death as a result of their faith.” The most vulnerable are Christian women. The report that every month:

  • “255 Christians are killed”
  • “104 are abducted”
  • “180 Christian women are raped, sexually harassed or forced into marriage”
  • “66 churches are attacked”
  • “160 Christians are detained without trial and imprisoned”

The Center for the Study of Global Christianity estimates that between 2005 and 2015, 900,000 Christians were martyred.

Open Doors USA claims:

“Islamic oppression is one of the most widely recognized sources of persecution for Christians in the world today — and it continues to spread — aiming to bring many parts of the world under Sharia law. The movement, which often results in Islamic militancy and the persecution of Christians, is expanding in Asia (Philippines, Bangladesh, Indonesia) and Africa (Egypt, Nigeria, Somalia).”

Let us have a look at another society in strife. Isis militants have caused havoc amongst the Christian women in the nations in which they operate. In 2014, Isis militant fighters swept through Christian towns near Mosul in Iraq causing thousands to flee. In an Iraqi Christian town called Qaraqosh, the militants pushed many Christian women into captivity to be sold as slaves across their caliphate. [11] These Christian girls have reported: “They did evil things to us. They beat us and raped us.” [11] Reports stated that girls as young as nine were enslaved and raped. Sale prices ranged from $4,000 to $15,000. [11] Enslaved Christian girls reported that the families told them: “If you go outside that door we will kill you.”

Reports of rape and occasional murder of Christian girls in Pakistan are common. After a nine-year-old Christian girl was raped by a Muslim male who boasted of having ‘done the same to other young Christian girls. Locals stated that: “Such incidents occur frequently. Christian girls are considered goods to be damaged at leisure. Abusing them is a right. According to the [Muslim] community’s mentality, it is not even a crime. Muslims regard them as spoils of war.” [12]

In Pakistan, the Muslims are the powerful majority and they take advantage of this situation. The ‘Vatican Insider’, writing about the plight of Christian girls, reports that: “Girls are abused, mistreated, raped, kidnapped and converted to Islam against their will.” If they don’t remain silent, they are subjected to further violence or violence is perpetrated against their families. [13] There is little sense in thinking that similar treatment will not come from Muslim males in the West when they have the upper hand. [13] It is not as if it is a modern phenomenon. Enslavement of Western white women by Muslims has taken place for centuries.

(Jean Leon Geromes Slave Market oil on canvas circa 1866.)

Between 1600 and 1800, coastal residents of England, Ireland, Scotland, France, Spain, Italy, Portugal, and beyond, lived with the worry of losing loved ones to slavery. Some estimate that over one and a quarter million Western white citizens were captured by North African slave traders and taken in chains to slave markets in North Africa. As Christians, they were further despised for their religion and were thus considered to be of the same level as vermin and were treated as such.

White slavery continued into the American Colonies. claims that an Israeli Hebrew website says that the total annual profits garnered from white slavery in Israel have reached the US $1 Billion Dollar mark. (2005) Apparently, 10,000 Eastern European and Russian girls are lured to Israel each year and enslaved as prostitutes. Over the past decade, about 100,000 women have been trafficked into Israel in what Keidar calls ‘modern slavery’. [16]

The Times of Israel reports that Israel has around 8,500 slaves in a total population of eight million. That sounds a bit anti-Christian to me.

“The trend in Israel is driven by the sex trade and the human trafficking that comes with it. There are 15,000 prostitutes in Israel, Rebecca Hughes from Atzum’s Task Force on Human Trafficking wrote in The Times of Israel, entering the profession at an average age of fourteen.” [19]


“Throughout the 1990’s traffickers acted with impunity and, according to the Hotline for Migrant Workers, smuggled 3,000 women annually into Israel.”

Now back to the problems facing girls in Western nations. The effect of feminism has been to render many males disinterested under the onslaught of feminist rants.

In the event of society breakdown on a local level as in a riot or nationally as in a financial meltdown, the males are not going to support the females. This is how regions are ruled in parts of Africa — by war-lords. Women have no rights.

Societal collapse is the disintegration of an organised human society and can be abrupt and unexpected. Rapid disintegration can be called collapse and delayed disintegration can be called decline. The Maya civilization collapsed abruptly whilst the Western Roman Empire declined. The collapse is likely to occur when ruling elites bring society closer to instability. The fastest collapse occurs with loss in confidence in the money which causes all forms of trade to effectively cease. We can only live in concentrations called cities if food is brought in from a hinterland where farmers are trusting to accept money in exchange from food. It is necessary to keep the farmers in debt to keep them producing. The nature of money is that it only has value if it can be exchanged for items. Contrary to the illogic of the incompetent economists, it is the goods that money can purchase that gives the backing for money. When money collapses, those with the guns get to feed themselves. The instability may be caused by excessive unpayable debt as in this graph:

Lack of trust in money causes it to be spent too quickly such that there is insufficient goods to back the volume of money that is rapidly being spent. The feature is called “hyperinflation”. The lack in trust in money may be caused by other issues that have a shock nature. The result is a collapse of the food distribution system followed by a disintegration of law and order. For the females, this was traditionally the devoted males that surrounded them. However, due to the disenfranchisement of the male stock, women will be particularly vulnerable. Instead of males following civilized procedures as outlined under female promoted ‘patriarchy’, the rule of the jungle will apply and males will forcibly follow their desire rather than follow the female created system of society where men had to go begging to women to have sex. The cheapest form of sex to a male is rape in a dysfunctional society or unlimited sex in a promiscuous society. The second cheapest is prostitution. The most expensive is marriage. However, only the last one gives the male the opportunity to bring up well-adjusted offspring for quality survival. So the male will reluctantly choose the latter.

Rape is unthinkable to most men. But sex is repeatedly on the mind of most men. I sometimes say in ‘man talk’: “Man was designed as a fucking machine.” but mostly as a provocative thinking procedure. Society under patriarchy channelled male sexual energy to the benefit of women and children in a system of training carried out by mothers. If man is not kept occupied, his mind drifts back to sex and how to obtain it. Societal breakdown and war modifies the unthinkableness of rape. The training of males to give them ‘respect for women’ is carried out by mothers as a moral code, sometimes called the “Christian Value System”. This is reinforced by fathers and is the primary method by which the mistreatment of women is discouraged. The secondary, less effective, method of discouraging rape and mistreatment of women is a legal system that catches a small percentage of the perpetrators and punishes a percentage of these perpetrators. For a safe society for women, sexual mores need to be very strong, great shame needs to be brought on perpetrators, and police need to be functional. Under collapse, a low-rape society becomes a high-rape society and there is a tendency to become willfully blind to rape. John Braithwaite writes: “They know rape is viewed as a just reward by some of their most useful warriors, or as just retribution for those they conquer. And even if rape is not a conscious strategy for driving civilians out or for persuading them against helping the enemy, commanders are well aware that rape works in instilling fear and flight.” It is necessary to institute international laws concerning war rape for any purpose and the encouragement of same. However, only the lack of war and society breakdown can minimize rape. The problem is compounded where there are no local men to defend the local girl’s honour with their lives. This might be because they are away fighting or they are dead or they are detained, as often occurs. However, punishment after the event requires that an event has occurred.

On the TV, as background noise as I write, a medieval general kicked a soldier off a woman and said: “Leave the women alone!” Under old fashioned Christian patriarchy, women were exempted from soldiering and, on moral standards, were be treated well. In the practical ravages of war, moral restraints disappeared.

Lucy Fiske and Rita Shackel write:

“The rape of women has for centuries been an endemic feature of war, yet perpetrators largely go unpunished. Women were sanctioned as the spoils of war in biblical times and more recently it has been claimed that it is more dangerous to be a woman than a soldier in modern conflict.” [18]

Peter Turchin writes that society could collapse at some point in the 2020s as political turmoil sweeps the Western world. An interesting point is the reaction to the democratic election of Mr. Trump. The concept of modern democracy is flawed due to the adoption of political parties that have policies decided by elites, however, the system relies on combatative electioneering where the public accepts the outcome. In this situation, many in the public do not accept his win.

This is the method for fomenting a revolution. Buffoons are prepared to endanger democracy by disagreeing with an election result. To further destabilize, TRE45ON is banded about. Trump being the 45 president.

Trump won the presidency. How was he going to lose against someone so easy to discredit as Hillary Clinton. I often say: “Never vote for a lawyer. They can talk this way convincingly, then they can talk the opposite convincingly depending who is supplying them with money.” It is not Trump that will destroy democracy, but those that do not accept his election win. Not to accept the winner of a fair election is to destroy democracy. You can feel the elite controlled media fanning the flames as they resort to innuendo to discredit a perfectly legal president who is driving the American economy ‘gang busters’ and minimizing inappropriate immigration. The revolution never gives the results that are expected. Revolutions are usually engineered by invisible hands and result in a far worse way of life for the citizenry.

[1] retrieved 2017-11-13
[2] EqualityNow retrieved 2017-11-07
[3] The Economist retrieved 2017-11-07
[4] Wikipedia retrieved 2017-11-07
[5] Gatestone Institute retrieved 2017-11-07
[6] To cite this article: Hsu-Ming Teo (1996) The continuum of sexual violence in occupied Germany, 1945-49, Women’s History Review, 5:2, 191-218 retrieved 2017-11-11
[7] V.I.Lenin, ‘Lessons of the Moscow Uprising’, Collected Works, Vol. 11, p174
[8] V.I.Lenin, “Lessons of the Moscow Uprising” published in Proletary magazine.
[9] The Atlantic – ‘A Woman Resident In Russia’s July 1926 Issue
[10] ‘Sex and Sexuality in Soviet Russia’,,
[15] Wikipedia
[17] Overhagen, 1990, P3

About the author


Leave a Comment