2017-02-04
Cultural Marxism, or just Marxism, is a method of taking control over a population. The idea is that by dividing a nation and turning the people against themselves, the government can then present itself as a solution to the civil unrest it has caused on the condition that complete control of society is surrendered by the people to the ruling classes. The end goal of Marxism, as with any other form of Communism, is complete Totalitarian rule.
The key tool used by Marxists to implement their agenda is what’s known as Critical Theory. This is simply the theory of criticising different aspects of a culture to the extent that it is normal for one to possess a general disdain for one’s traditional way of life as oppose to associating it with feelings of identity. Marxists restructure society in such a way that the people of a society become socially conditioned to feel negative emotions when presented with anything resembling their own culture, thus making them much less likely to defend it should it come under any threat. By browbeating a nation through tactics like shaming language, a rewriting of their history and an enforced doctrine of globalism and multiculturalism, in time a lack of national identity begins to appear. This is especially true for the younger generations who know less of yesterday’s world and the past experiences it may bring but instead rely more on what they have consumed through the education system.
Patriotism is the main adversary of Cultural Marxism. It is natural for people to feel a loyalty towards their nation and this loyalty must be abolished in order for Marxism to take effect; this is done by restructuring a nation’s allegiance. During a Marxist infiltration, mainstream media outlets along with the education system adopt a program of national shaming by constantly enforcing and reinforcing the message that one’s country is to blame for many of the problems in today’s world. The negative aspects of history are emphasised and exaggerated whereas the positive aspects are either only briefly discussed or simply omitted. It can also be noted that according to Cultural Marxists, the good deeds of a nation’s history were done in spite of its culture whereas the bad deeds were done because of its culture, in essence agency only applies during a negative analysis. Branding patriotism as nationalism is a subtle but effective tool used by Marxists to shame a nation out of allegiance to its country. The key difference here must be established. Patriotism is a love of one’s country and its culture as well as a desire to preserve the traditional way of life. Nationalism on the other hand is much more aggressive and militant in nature. Where a patriot wants to put his flag up in his own country, a nationalist wants to put his flag up in everyone else’s country as well. It is therefore academic folly to brand an individual as nationalistic for expressing a desire to preserve his own culture although Marxists perpetually do this knowingly and wilfully as it is essential to help drive their agenda.
One of the most effective policies Marxists use to wipe out national identity is multiculturalism. Two main tools employed to achieve a multicultural society are a relentless promotion of the ideology of multiculturalism through the media and education system combined with open borders and mass immigration. In the case of uncontrolled mass immigration, people are allowed to join a nation regardless of whether they have any intention of assimilating to the society they are joining or not. By forcing people from many different cultures to live in a confined space such as a town or city, a natural and predictable division is caused from where the people in that area do not live together on congenial terms as they possess differences in opinion on how one should live, in extreme cases these differences in culture can be noticeably stark. In order to achieve a multicultural society, people from different cultures within a community should be discouraged from holding the same opinions, but instead they are taught to celebrate their differences whilst being instructed that a society of many different identities is ideal and represents the progressive and proper way forward for civilisation. Marxists teach to children through education, as well as the masses through the media that only a multicultural vision can possibly be the enlightened opinion despite knowing it only leads to division almost everywhere it is applied. The only exception to the rule and the only environment where a multicultural society can function is in an area of extreme wealth as people with vast sums of money know it is not in their financial interests to incite division among their communities however as regions become more impoverished, the tendency for divisions to arise due to cultural differences increases dramatically leading to a ghettoization among the working classes.
Teaching multiculturalism to the youth is much more effective because they can be taught this ideology in an incubated environment such as a school or university where the education system holds the monopoly on the truth and it becomes taboo for students to question the content they consume. A fear of being ostracised is much more apparent among younger people where they are more socially conscious and are thus more likely to voice an opinion that is shared by their peers rather than one that might draw too much attention to themselves. A desire to fit in, combined with a fear of challenging the narrative, which is natural for children of a young age makes it very easy to control the youth. Adults however, who are more experienced in the world and care less for public opinion and more for their own experiences are much more of a challenge for Marxists to manipulate, hence the invention of political correctness. Where a Marxist cannot hope to convince an individual that their culture is inherently wrong and needs to be improved in the way that a Marxist suggests, a Cultural Marxist can still hope to silence an individual who dares to question the narrative. This is first achieved by creating something of an intellectual Gulag, where instead of imprisoning groups or individuals for holding certain opinions, to begin with a Marxist will manipulate language in order to make certain words unspeakable and therefore certain thoughts unthinkable. The creation of labels plays an essential role here. If a society can be programmed in such a way that the people can be conditioned to police themselves then it will save a Marxist from the impossible task of micromanaging a nation by themselves. Those more affected by the charms of Cultural Marxism may take it upon themselves to campaign for what they believe to be social justice. These campaigners act as officers for Marxists in the sense that they are trained to lambast any individual with labels who voices an opinion that doesn’t suit their agenda, thus silencing any opposition by making the argument non-debatable. Some tactics used by these Marxist officers known as social justice campaigners include branding those with traditional conservative opinions as fearful, hateful or even mentally ill, by taking it upon themselves to conduct an on the spot psychoanalysis and declaring that certain individuals are suffering from some sort of phobia. After the political correctness program has been allowed to run on for some considerable time, Marxists will then introduce hate crimes. A hate crime is the next stage in political correctness. At first any opinion that opposes the Marxist approach is only taboo and any individual can expect only labels and demonization at first. In time however, by the use of hate crimes eventually individuals with different opinions can expect to find their views illegal thus criminalising the other side of the debate. With the threat of fines or imprisonment a society is much more likely to voice the opinions they are allowed to have and those opinions only, for they know what the consequences can be if they dare offer alternative views.
Whilst being forced to accept the ways of other cultures, native populations will find that the pillars of their own culture also come under attack. Traditional gender roles as well as long established religions must be tampered with either through shaming language or ridicule in order to make way for Marxist liberalism. Individuals who are either believers in the nations traditional religion or even those individuals who share traditional views in tune with that religion, regardless of whether they believe it or not, will be told their opinions are now backwards and have been the source of oppression for preceding generations since their establishment. Similarly, traditional gender roles are abolished and the nation is taught again through the media and especially the education system that both genders are the same, traditional roles are oppressive and anyone who suggests otherwise is an oppressor and must be bombarded with labels. The reason Marxists realise they must tamper with traditional gender roles and religious institutions is because they understand that a traditional lifestyle is the best environment for a population to thrive.
In a traditional family, the fathers’ role is little more than that of a workhorse provider whereas the mothers’ role is little more than a home keeper and nurturer of the children. Men have their male psychology manipulated in order to believe the only way for them to truly be men is if they spend their lives working hard in order to provide resources for their wives and children whilst women are coerced into believing they must marry young and stay with their husbands regardless of potential financial peril or changing circumstances. For all sakes and purposes, the mother and father could be compared to as servants to their children. Traditional gender roles ensure that the parents provide for their children whilst religion is used to ensure the parents pair bond through marriage. In a liberal society, both men and women are encouraged to pursue the most financially rewarding path of a career driven lifestyle. This leaves both males and females with more money which they are encouraged to spend on themselves and the decision to start a family loses its place as first priority for young adults. The belittlement of both religion and the institution of marriage in a liberal society, combined with the devolution of the legal powers that a traditional marriage used to possess, reduces the incentive for couples to pair bond and remain together throughout the upbringing of their children. The purpose of all this is to decline the birth rate among the native population in order to make way for other populations with different cultures, who are more inclined to reproduce at higher rates. This undermines the largest culture within a country and increases proportional cultural representation of all minor cultures, thus pathing the way for a dysfunctional multicultural society void of any mainstream identity.
Once all this has been achieved and the government has successfully broken up a nation to the extent where different cultures have become factions consumed by their constant power struggle to become the establishment, the Marxist divide and rule tactic can take full effect. Instead of being able to identify the creeping totalitarian rule as the true enemy of the people, the squabbling factions are instead obsessed with fighting amongst themselves over an endless list of social elements including race, religion, gender, nationality etc. Once the nation has become fully ghettoised and reached its breaking point, the government will rebrand itself as the saviour of the people and blame all ongoing societal failings as the responsibility of the previous government. The crucial part in the final stage of a Marxist takeover is total subjugation of the masses through a complete removal of what is left of the human rights that the Marxists have not yet abolished. The theory is that by this point the nation will be so desperate for order to be restored that any price will be payable, and the relinquishment of civil freedoms will be but a small price to pay in order to attain what will be presented by the Marxists as a peaceful and stable society. In creating crisis the Marxists have created demand for stability, offering themselves as the solution. Lastly it will be through the abolition of human rights that all those within the society will be truly equal, with only two labels becoming relevant; the proletariat and the ruling class. Any political individuals who campaigned either for or against liberalism will be removed from society, as the only purpose of a prole within a Marxist rule is to do, and not to think, and any of those who were useful in the takeover are just as much of a threat to narrative as those who opposed it, as the party can be the only source of influence from the point of rule onwards. As for the proletariat of whom have no political opinion and choose to be willful slaves, regardless of race, religion, nationality or gender and through abolition of all human rights and identity, they are all equal now.
